Such superintelligence would not be just another technological development; it would be the most important invention ever made, and would lead to explosive progress in all scientific and technological fields, as the superintelligence would conduct research with superhuman efficiency. To the extent that ethics is a cognitive pursuit, a superintelligence could also easily surpass humans in the quality of its moral thinking.
This paper presents over 30 significant ethical issues that remain unresolved and invite more discussion by the general public.
Social policy regarding these issues shouldn't be decided by special interest groups and lobbyists. Ethical questions paper list below is meant to be evocative rather than comprehensive. I hope it stimulates you to think of some issues I haven't listed.
Perhaps we'll add them to the list. The answers to the issues listed below aren't easily deduced from any type of philosophy that I know of—maybe a few, but not all. To assume that a grand unified philosophical theory can address all these issues adequately may be a form of reductionistic thinking.
Some of the easier problems in my mind involve the more individual issues. One application of these issues is as a way to assess the effectiveness of a philosophical system or theory of consciousness-raising.
Ethics involves the sphere of interpersonal, group, and community politics at the level of values—not just what can be achieved or how to achieve it, but more what should be sought, in the realm of social harmony and fairness.
It is the complexity of the other side of individualism— other than taking care of oneself, what do we want our collective to do or refrain from doing? Ethics looks at our proper relations, our duties to each other, indvidually and collectively.
In the past, ethics—and a good deal of civil law, in addition—was mixed with the requirements of religious ritual and the establishment of the details of the priestly caste. There was no other law back then, around the time of Moses, at least for the wandering Israelites, and when the alleged basic rules were laid down in the Torah, the first five books of the Bible.
In most other countries, the law wasn't codified, and although there were traditions, the king was the boss and he could be pretty capricious.
The code of Hammurabi, around BC in the area near Babylon, was a bit of an exception, as far as we know. It took a while to establish a civil government with some semblance of consistent law, and the revisions of the code re-established this effort.
Such efforts also were in reaction to the growing problems of trade, the establishments of small sub-cultural communities within larger communities, and inter-cultural mixing, which then required laws that applied to all sub-cultures within a greater empire.
Before that, each minority or mini-nation or tribe was allowed to apply its own traditional rules of justice—as long as they paid their taxes, sent their military levies, and didn't make trouble, they were left pretty much alone.
The ascendency of the Church in the West and of a theocratic legal system in the Islamic Empires tended to re-establish a more theocratic process, but once again this has broken down in most countries of the West and many in the Middle East, so that civil questions are distinguished from religious ones.
This preamble is being presented because there's still a sense that our ethical rules are if not explicitly described in the Bible, they are implicit there, and can be applied to all modern issues. The Jews actually tried to do this, and the Talmudic tradition was a result, an interpretative tradition that laid the groundwork for some of the later traditions of rational argumentation found in our judicial systems.
But the problem is this: New circumstances and technologies really create new problems. Should we rationally tie our ethics to these traditional sources and precedents, especially when they arose out of cultures that may be becoming minority cultures in our present society?Ethical Question.
Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read Chapter 1 of the textbook. This chapter will introduce you to the basic form and subject matter of ethical reasoning and assist you as you select an ethical question, examine the context, issues, and arguments surrounding the question, and attempt to defend an answer to the question.
The first thing you must consider when having a wedding is the engagement ring! And what a minefield of ethics it is. Conflict-free? Non-diamond? Australian diamond? Recycled metal? Sterling silver? I spent literally MONTHS researching an ethical engagement ring and finally I can pass on that knowledge to all you ethical brides and .
Tags: general studies ethics question paper mains ias mains gs 4 question paper UPSC CIVIL SERVICES MAINS EXAM General Studies ethics paper UPSC CIVIL SERVICES MAINS EXAM General Studies Paper – 4 Question Paper upsc ias mains upsc mains ethics question paper Next story 1) Why the attack on Pearl Harbour by Japanese forces during the .
Ethical issues across cultures: managing the differing perspectives of China and the USA Dennis A. Pitta Professor of Marketing, University of Baltimore, Baltimore. 1 Metaethical problems for ethical egoism reconsidered Benjamin Bayer July 6, Until recently it has been conventional to assume that ethical egoism is “ethical.
Sample Question Paper for Ethics (UPSC Civil Services Mains Exam Paper 5): UPSC has released sample questions for ethics paper – the newly introduced topic – for Civil Services Mains benjaminpohle.com Mains – ethics related questions come in Paper 5 (General Studies Paper 4).